Remember the front-page article a month or so making a big deal about how now more women were living without spouses than with? The one (and a lot of people missed this, it seems) that included in the category of "women" girls of fifteen or older?
The paper's Public Editor criticizes what he calls "several lapses" in the handling of this story.
"Readers deserved [a] more tempered perspective back on Jan. 16 — and a more tempered story, displayed on an inside page."
Comments