One of Jimmy Akin's co-bloggers (Tim Jones) has started an interesting discussion about the value of abstract visual art. I want to throw something out there because I think I have if not a good answer, at least the start of a good answer (aside from Yay for abstract art because I like it! and Boo for abstract art because I hate it!).
The question is, is non-objective art (e.g. abstract paintings, sculpture, etc. that depict no recognizable subject) capable of substantive communication? My answer is yes, conceivably, but not to any large extent in our culture at this time, and not in the near future either. My reasoning is in the extended post.

Recent Comments