There are reports of a Eucharistic miracle occurring recently in Lourdes.
By "recently" I mean it happened seven years ago. The bishops kept things quiet, but it is being talked about now because a cardinal found out about it and brought it to the Pope's attention, and the Pope thinks there might be something to it, or at least thinks the French bishops were too hasty in deciding not to consider it.
If my (very rudimentary) Italian serves me right, it seems that at the Mass of the Italian National Eucharistic Congress in 1999 (which explains why there is video footage of the Mass), the host levitated about half an inch above the paten from the epiclesis until the end of the canon of the Mass.
If you are confused about why the bishops did not tell everyone but instead kept it under wraps, first let me explain that this is what usually happens even when something quite otherwise inexplicable has happened. When an unusual supernatural event, prodigious sign, or miracle is reported, with the exception of atheists who dogmatically deny that such things can occur, there is no one more difficult to convince of its authenticity than a priest, especially a bishop. This is not an indication that priests do not believe such things can or do occur - the most faithful are perhaps the most demanding. You can understand, perhaps, how strongly they want to avoid giving credence to something and then having it turn out to be not of divine origin. When you hear that the Church has "approved" an apparition or miracle, you can be sure that it has been subjected to the most intense scrutiny by the most skeptical people they can find, including atheists, to see if it can be accounted for by natural causes. For the Lourdes healings (of which there are many), the investigation process is just now making public its findings on things that happened fifty years ago, just to avoid rash judgment.
Secondly, because the Church does not depend on visible miracles as a chief means of converting peoples' hearts. They're certainly nice when they happen, and often a help to peoples' faith and devotion, but the Church is so confident in the truth that has been entrusted to her keeping by Christ that she does not "need" miracles. She is not desperate to demonstrate that the supernatural exists. This is traceable to our Lord in the Gospels - look at his attitude toward his own signs and wonders. For instance, when St. Joseph of Cupertino started levitating all over the place (this is attested to in his bull of canonization - see the previous paragraph), his superiors did not parade him out in front of everyone (Hey - come see the amazing levitating guy!) even to try to get people to believe in the Church's preaching. Rather, they locked him in the basement. Perhaps this seems strange, but it is the way the Church works.
Third, the Catholic Church is Miracle Central. We can't keep track of them all. If you believe what the Church teaches about the Eucharist, a little levitation, while out of the ordinary, wouldn't even be the most noteworthy thing about a Mass. Most people haven't even heard of Lanciano, which sounds like it would be a lot harder to fake than this (reported) one.
Anyway, this is neat to hear about, but if there is ever a definitive official decision on this one, it probably won't happen for a good long while. In the meanwhile, God makes Himself bodily present at every Mass. But that's not news, I suppose, since it happens every day. Once a reporter asked Pope John Paul why God doesn't reveal Himself more so that more people would believe in him; the Pope answered that if anything, God had revealed Himself so much that people find it hard to believe.
Recent Comments